Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for automotive and industrial software, UK-led Polish teams. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 1993 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland (UK office in Dorset) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States (London and Newcastle offices) |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, managed service, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C++, Java, .NET | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing |
Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was set up in 2016 by a group that included UK-based co-founder Andrew Radcliffe, and its UK entity actually came before its first Polish office. It is headquartered in Wrocław and has grown quickly, with figures ranging from around 800 to 1,900 staff depending on the source. Spyrosoft Ltd runs UK operations from Dorset, with delivery mostly in Poland. Automotive, embedded and industrial software are notable strengths next to standard web and cloud work.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania. It reported more than 62,750 employees in Q1 2026. In the UK it has offices in London and Newcastle, but most delivery comes from Central and Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Its size suits large regulated programmes better than small or mid-sized builds.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Spyrosoft | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers., A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | A bank needs a 200-person platform programme., A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire |
| + | Embedded and automotive work adds range for hardware-adjacent projects |
| + | Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, so financial results are public |
| - | Rapid growth through hiring and acquisitions can mean uneven maturity between business units |
| - | The UK office is small; nearly all engineers are in Poland |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme |
| + | Mature security, audit and compliance processes for regulated buyers |
| + | Public-company reporting |
| - | Little benefit for mid-market buyers, who can get more attention elsewhere |
| - | UK offices are small relative to global delivery |
| - | Account processes are heavy for smaller projects |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers.
Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a bank needs a 200-person platform programme.
The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Spyrosoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Spyrosoft |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A bank needs a 200-person platform programme. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a global retailer wants a managed engineering service. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than EPAM Systems?
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme.
How do Spyrosoft and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, managed service, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and EPAM Systems?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Financial services vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.