Endava vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1993 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States (London and Newcastle offices) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Time and materials, managed service, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing |
Endava vs EPAM Systems: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania. It reported more than 62,750 employees in Q1 2026. In the UK it has offices in London and Newcastle, but most delivery comes from Central and Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Its size suits large regulated programmes better than small or mid-sized builds.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Endava | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Endava | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Endava | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Endava | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A bank needs a 200-person platform programme., A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme |
| + | Mature security, audit and compliance processes for regulated buyers |
| + | Public-company reporting |
| - | Little benefit for mid-market buyers, who can get more attention elsewhere |
| - | UK offices are small relative to global delivery |
| - | Account processes are heavy for smaller projects |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a bank needs a 200-person platform programme.
The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Endava vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | EPAM Systems |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Endava vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Endava fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A bank needs a 200-person platform programme. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
Verdict: Endava vs EPAM Systems
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a global retailer wants a managed engineering service. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Endava better than EPAM Systems?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme.
How do Endava and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, managed service, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and EPAM Systems?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.