Scott Logic vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Scott Logic (4.3/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.1/5) overall. Scott Logic is the better choice for capital markets and government, UK-only delivery required. Infinum is the stronger option for consumer apps where design quality matters. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Scott Logic vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Scott Logic | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
| HQ | Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 400–500 | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, capability-based | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, C#, TypeScript | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Financial services, Capital markets, Public sector, Energy | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail |
Scott Logic vs Infinum: overview
Scott Logic
Former Lehman Brothers executive Gary Scott founded Scott Logic in Newcastle in 2005. It now employs 400+ people across Newcastle, London, Edinburgh, Bristol and Leeds, all in the UK. The firm is best known for trading and capital-markets software and for central government digital work. Every engineer is UK-based, which suits security-cleared and data-sensitive projects but rules out offshore cost savings.
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
Services and capabilities: Scott Logic vs Infinum
| Capability | Scott Logic | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Scott Logic vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | Scott Logic | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Scott Logic vs Infinum
| Criterion | Scott Logic | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Scott Logic vs Infinum
| Dimension | Scott Logic | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Capital markets, Public sector | Financial services, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | An investment bank needs a trading front end rebuilt by a UK-cleared team., A government department needs a digital service built to GDS standards. | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Scott Logic vs Infinum: pros and cons
| Scott Logic | |
|---|---|
| + | UK-only staffing makes security clearance and data-residency requirements straightforward |
| + | Rare depth in trading platforms and low-latency financial software |
| + | Regional offices outside London keep rates below the big London consultancies |
| - | No nearshore or offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates for every role |
| - | Narrower industry spread than generalist outsourcing vendors |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
Who should choose Scott Logic?
A typical fit: an investment bank needs a trading front end rebuilt by a UK-cleared team.
Trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Capital markets, Public sector, Energy.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Decision matrix: Scott Logic vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Scott Logic |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Scott Logic (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Scott Logic |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Scott Logic vs Infinum
| Use case | Scott Logic fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An investment bank needs a trading front end rebuilt by a UK-cleared team. | Strong | Limited | Scott Logic |
| A government department needs a digital service built to GDS standards. | Strong | Limited | Scott Logic |
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Scott Logic vs Infinum
Scott Logic (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK.
Infinum (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Scott Logic vs Infinum FAQ
Is Scott Logic better than Infinum?
Scott Logic (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Scott Logic's strongest advantage: UK-only staffing makes security clearance and data-residency requirements straightforward. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products.
How do Scott Logic and Infinum differ in pricing?
Scott Logic uses time and materials, fixed price, capability-based pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Scott Logic or Infinum?
Scott Logic is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Scott Logic and Infinum?
Scott Logic's primary differentiator is: trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK. Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. They also differ in team size (400–500 vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Capital markets vs Financial services, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.