Endava vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.1/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. Infinum is the stronger option for consumer apps where design quality matters. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2005 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail |
Endava vs Infinum: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Infinum
| Capability | Endava | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | Endava | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Infinum
| Criterion | Endava | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Infinum
| Dimension | Endava | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Financial services, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs Infinum: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Endava vs Infinum
| Use case | Endava fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
Verdict: Endava vs Infinum
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
Infinum (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Infinum FAQ
Is Endava better than Infinum?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products.
How do Endava and Infinum differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Infinum?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Infinum?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Financial services, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.