Infinum vs Codurance: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Infinum (4.1/5) edges ahead of Codurance (4.1/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for consumer apps where design quality matters. Codurance is the stronger option for legacy modernisation, engineering-practice improvement. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Infinum vs Codurance: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Infinum | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2013 |
| HQ | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 350–450 | 150–300 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps | Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Java, Kotlin, C# |
| Industries served | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Media, Public sector |
Infinum vs Codurance: overview
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
Codurance
Mashooq Badar co-founded Codurance in London in 2013. Its pitch is software craftsmanship: test-driven development, pairing and clean architecture. Besides London and Manchester, it has offices in Barcelona, Madrid and Lisbon, which bring Iberian rates into the mix. Headcount estimates range from roughly 170 to 300.
Services and capabilities: Infinum vs Codurance
| Capability | Infinum | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs Codurance
| Framework / platform | Infinum | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Infinum vs Codurance
| Criterion | Infinum | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Team extension, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Infinum vs Codurance
| Dimension | Infinum | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Media, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Media |
| Best use cases | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | A company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work., An engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Infinum vs Codurance: pros and cons
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
| Codurance | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong on cleaning up legacy codebases and raising engineering standards |
| + | Spanish and Portuguese offices provide a cheaper option without leaving Western Europe |
| + | Coaching is built into engagements, so client teams improve along the way |
| - | Small team limits how fast it can staff a large programme |
| - | Iberian rates are higher than Central and Eastern European ones |
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Who should choose Codurance?
A typical fit: a company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work.
Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Media, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Infinum vs Codurance
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs Codurance (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Infinum |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Codurance |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Infinum vs Codurance
| Use case | Infinum fit | Codurance fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work. | Limited | Strong | Codurance |
| An engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. | Limited | Strong | Codurance |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Infinum vs Codurance
Infinum (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps.
Codurance (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. If your situation matches that, Codurance is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Infinum vs Codurance FAQ
Is Infinum better than Codurance?
Infinum (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products. Codurance's strongest advantage: strong on cleaning up legacy codebases and raising engineering standards.
How do Infinum and Codurance differ in pricing?
Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Codurance uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or Codurance?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Infinum and Codurance?
Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Codurance's primary differentiator is: craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 150–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Media vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.