Infinum vs Apadmi: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Infinum (4.1/5) edges ahead of Apadmi (3.9/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for consumer apps where design quality matters. Apadmi is the stronger option for UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Infinum vs Apadmi: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Infinum | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2009 |
| HQ | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 350–450 | 250–300 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail | Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector |
Infinum vs Apadmi: overview
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
Apadmi
Apadmi was founded in 2009 in Manchester and has its headquarters at MediaCity. It reported more than 300 employees in 2024, with hubs in London, Edinburgh, Lisbon and Amsterdam. The company builds and maintains mobile apps for large UK brands, including Argos, the BBC, Co-op, Asda and the NHS. Its Lisbon hub adds a lower-cost option within Western Europe.
Services and capabilities: Infinum vs Apadmi
| Capability | Infinum | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs Apadmi
| Framework / platform | Infinum | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Infinum vs Apadmi
| Criterion | Infinum | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Infinum vs Apadmi
| Dimension | Infinum | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Media, Healthcare | Retail, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt., An NHS body wants a patient app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Infinum vs Apadmi: pros and cons
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
| Apadmi | |
|---|---|
| + | Mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise |
| + | Recognisable UK client list gives reassurance on quality |
| + | Lisbon hub offers some rate flexibility |
| - | Narrow focus; back-office and enterprise systems are not its core |
| - | Mostly UK delivery, so pricing is close to onshore rates |
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Who should choose Apadmi?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt.
Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Infinum vs Apadmi
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs Apadmi (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Infinum |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Infinum vs Apadmi
| Use case | Infinum fit | Apadmi fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| An NHS body wants a patient app. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Infinum vs Apadmi
Infinum (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps.
Apadmi (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an NHS body wants a patient app. If your situation matches that, Apadmi is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Infinum vs Apadmi FAQ
Is Infinum better than Apadmi?
Infinum (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products. Apadmi's strongest advantage: mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise.
How do Infinum and Apadmi differ in pricing?
Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Apadmi uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or Apadmi?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Infinum and Apadmi?
Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Apadmi's primary differentiator is: mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 250–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Media vs Retail, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.