DataArt vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
DataArt (4.0/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. DataArt is the better choice for travel and finance firms, long-term nearshore teams. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
DataArt vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | DataArt | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1997 | 1993 |
| HQ | New York, United States (London office) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States (London and Newcastle offices) |
| Team size | 5,000–6,000 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, managed service, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, Python | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing |
DataArt vs EPAM Systems: overview
DataArt
Eugene Goland founded DataArt in New York in 1997, and the company opened in London in 2001. It reports more than 6,000 people as of September 2025, spread across Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America and elsewhere. Travel and hospitality, finance and healthcare are its strongest industries. UK clients get a long-standing London presence with delivery from lower-cost locations.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania. It reported more than 62,750 employees in Q1 2026. In the UK it has offices in London and Newcastle, but most delivery comes from Central and Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Its size suits large regulated programmes better than small or mid-sized builds.
Services and capabilities: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | DataArt | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | DataArt | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | DataArt | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | DataArt | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work., A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. | A bank needs a 200-person platform programme., A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
DataArt vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| DataArt | |
|---|---|
| + | London office has been open since 2001 |
| + | Specialist knowledge of travel booking and distribution systems |
| + | Delivery spread across several regions |
| - | US headquarters means UK contracts may sit with a non-UK parent |
| - | Headcount estimates vary widely between sources |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme |
| + | Mature security, audit and compliance processes for regulated buyers |
| + | Public-company reporting |
| - | Little benefit for mid-market buyers, who can get more attention elsewhere |
| - | UK offices are small relative to global delivery |
| - | Account processes are heavy for smaller projects |
Who should choose DataArt?
A typical fit: a travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work.
Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a bank needs a 200-person platform programme.
The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | EPAM Systems |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | DataArt |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: DataArt (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | DataArt |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | DataArt fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work. | Strong | Limited | DataArt |
| A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. | Strong | Limited | DataArt |
| A bank needs a 200-person platform programme. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
Verdict: DataArt vs EPAM Systems
DataArt (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a global retailer wants a managed engineering service. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
DataArt vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is DataArt better than EPAM Systems?
DataArt (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. DataArt's strongest advantage: london office has been open since 2001. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme.
How do DataArt and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
DataArt uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, managed service, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: DataArt or EPAM Systems?
DataArt is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between DataArt and EPAM Systems?
DataArt's primary differentiator is: two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. They also differ in team size (5,000–6,000 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Travel and hospitality, Financial services vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.