Apadmi vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Apadmi (3.9/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Apadmi is the better choice for UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Apadmi vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Apadmi | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 1993 |
| HQ | Manchester, United Kingdom | Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States (London and Newcastle offices) |
| Team size | 250–300 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, managed service, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing |
Apadmi vs EPAM Systems: overview
Apadmi
Apadmi was founded in 2009 in Manchester and has its headquarters at MediaCity. It reported more than 300 employees in 2024, with hubs in London, Edinburgh, Lisbon and Amsterdam. The company builds and maintains mobile apps for large UK brands, including Argos, the BBC, Co-op, Asda and the NHS. Its Lisbon hub adds a lower-cost option within Western Europe.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania. It reported more than 62,750 employees in Q1 2026. In the UK it has offices in London and Newcastle, but most delivery comes from Central and Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Its size suits large regulated programmes better than small or mid-sized builds.
Services and capabilities: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Apadmi | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Apadmi | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Apadmi | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Apadmi | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Media, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt., An NHS body wants a patient app. | A bank needs a 200-person platform programme., A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Apadmi vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Apadmi | |
|---|---|
| + | Mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise |
| + | Recognisable UK client list gives reassurance on quality |
| + | Lisbon hub offers some rate flexibility |
| - | Narrow focus; back-office and enterprise systems are not its core |
| - | Mostly UK delivery, so pricing is close to onshore rates |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme |
| + | Mature security, audit and compliance processes for regulated buyers |
| + | Public-company reporting |
| - | Little benefit for mid-market buyers, who can get more attention elsewhere |
| - | UK offices are small relative to global delivery |
| - | Account processes are heavy for smaller projects |
Who should choose Apadmi?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt.
Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a bank needs a 200-person platform programme.
The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Apadmi |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Apadmi (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Apadmi fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt. | Strong | Limited | Apadmi |
| An NHS body wants a patient app. | Strong | Limited | Apadmi |
| A bank needs a 200-person platform programme. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Apadmi vs EPAM Systems
Apadmi (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a global retailer wants a managed engineering service. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Apadmi vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Apadmi better than EPAM Systems?
Apadmi (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Apadmi's strongest advantage: mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme.
How do Apadmi and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Apadmi uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, managed service, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Apadmi or EPAM Systems?
Apadmi is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Apadmi and EPAM Systems?
Apadmi's primary differentiator is: mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. They also differ in team size (250–300 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Media vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.