AND Digital vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
AND Digital (4.0/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. AND Digital is the better choice for companies building in-house digital capability. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
AND Digital vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | AND Digital | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 1993 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States (London and Newcastle offices) |
| Team size | 1,000–1,500 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, capability-based | Time and materials, managed service, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | JavaScript, TypeScript, React | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing |
AND Digital vs EPAM Systems: overview
AND Digital
AND Digital was founded in 2014 by CEO Paramjit Uppal and is organised into city-based units it calls clubs. It passed 1,000 employees in 2021, and current third-party estimates range from 600 to 1,350. Its pitch is to build products while training the client's own people to take over. Delivery is largely UK-based, with smaller operations in the Netherlands and the US East Coast.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania. It reported more than 62,750 employees in Q1 2026. In the UK it has offices in London and Newcastle, but most delivery comes from Central and Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Its size suits large regulated programmes better than small or mid-sized builds.
Services and capabilities: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | AND Digital | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | AND Digital | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | AND Digital | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | AND Digital | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Financial services, Media | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it., A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. | A bank needs a 200-person platform programme., A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. |
| Typical project type | Team extension | Dedicated team |
AND Digital vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency |
| + | Regional clubs give UK clients a local team in many cities |
| + | Good fit for digital product work in retail and consumer brands |
| - | Onshore model means no offshore cost advantage |
| - | Headcount figures vary widely between sources |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme |
| + | Mature security, audit and compliance processes for regulated buyers |
| + | Public-company reporting |
| - | Little benefit for mid-market buyers, who can get more attention elsewhere |
| - | UK offices are small relative to global delivery |
| - | Account processes are heavy for smaller projects |
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: a retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it.
Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a bank needs a 200-person platform programme.
The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | EPAM Systems |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: AND Digital (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | AND Digital |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | AND Digital fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it. | Strong | Limited | AND Digital |
| A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. | Strong | Limited | AND Digital |
| A bank needs a 200-person platform programme. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
Verdict: AND Digital vs EPAM Systems
AND Digital (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a global retailer wants a managed engineering service. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
AND Digital vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is AND Digital better than EPAM Systems?
AND Digital (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. AND Digital's strongest advantage: knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme.
How do AND Digital and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
AND Digital uses time and materials, capability-based pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, managed service, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: AND Digital or EPAM Systems?
AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between AND Digital and EPAM Systems?
AND Digital's primary differentiator is: delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. They also differ in team size (1,000–1,500 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Financial services vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.