Spyrosoft vs DataArt: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) edges ahead of DataArt (4.0/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for automotive and industrial software, UK-led Polish teams. DataArt is the stronger option for travel and finance firms, long-term nearshore teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs DataArt: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 1997 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland (UK office in Dorset) | New York, United States (London office) |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 5,000–6,000 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business | Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C++, Java, .NET | Java, .NET, Python |
| Industries served | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare | Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail |
Spyrosoft vs DataArt: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was set up in 2016 by a group that included UK-based co-founder Andrew Radcliffe, and its UK entity actually came before its first Polish office. It is headquartered in Wrocław and has grown quickly, with figures ranging from around 800 to 1,900 staff depending on the source. Spyrosoft Ltd runs UK operations from Dorset, with delivery mostly in Poland. Automotive, embedded and industrial software are notable strengths next to standard web and cloud work.
DataArt
Eugene Goland founded DataArt in New York in 1997, and the company opened in London in 2001. It reports more than 6,000 people as of September 2025, spread across Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America and elsewhere. Travel and hospitality, finance and healthcare are its strongest industries. UK clients get a long-standing London presence with delivery from lower-cost locations.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
| Capability | Spyrosoft | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing | Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers., A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work., A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Spyrosoft vs DataArt: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire |
| + | Embedded and automotive work adds range for hardware-adjacent projects |
| + | Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, so financial results are public |
| - | Rapid growth through hiring and acquisitions can mean uneven maturity between business units |
| - | The UK office is small; nearly all engineers are in Poland |
| DataArt | |
|---|---|
| + | London office has been open since 2001 |
| + | Specialist knowledge of travel booking and distribution systems |
| + | Delivery spread across several regions |
| - | US headquarters means UK contracts may sit with a non-UK parent |
| - | Headcount estimates vary widely between sources |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers.
Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Who should choose DataArt?
A typical fit: a travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work.
Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Spyrosoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not published) vs DataArt (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | DataArt |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Spyrosoft |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | DataArt fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work. | Limited | Strong | DataArt |
| A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. | Limited | Strong | DataArt |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs DataArt
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business.
DataArt (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. If your situation matches that, DataArt is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs DataArt FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than DataArt?
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire. DataArt's strongest advantage: london office has been open since 2001.
How do Spyrosoft and DataArt differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. DataArt uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or DataArt?
DataArt is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and DataArt?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. DataArt's primary differentiator is: two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 5,000–6,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Financial services vs Travel and hospitality, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.