Spyrosoft vs AND Digital: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) edges ahead of AND Digital (4.0/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for automotive and industrial software, UK-led Polish teams. AND Digital is the stronger option for companies building in-house digital capability. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs AND Digital: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland (UK office in Dorset) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 1,000–1,500 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business | Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, capability-based |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C++, Java, .NET | JavaScript, TypeScript, React |
| Industries served | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare | Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector |
Spyrosoft vs AND Digital: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was set up in 2016 by a group that included UK-based co-founder Andrew Radcliffe, and its UK entity actually came before its first Polish office. It is headquartered in Wrocław and has grown quickly, with figures ranging from around 800 to 1,900 staff depending on the source. Spyrosoft Ltd runs UK operations from Dorset, with delivery mostly in Poland. Automotive, embedded and industrial software are notable strengths next to standard web and cloud work.
AND Digital
AND Digital was founded in 2014 by CEO Paramjit Uppal and is organised into city-based units it calls clubs. It passed 1,000 employees in 2021, and current third-party estimates range from 600 to 1,350. Its pitch is to build products while training the client's own people to take over. Delivery is largely UK-based, with smaller operations in the Netherlands and the US East Coast.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
| Capability | Spyrosoft | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Team extension, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing | Retail, Financial services, Media |
| Best use cases | An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers., A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it., A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Team extension |
Spyrosoft vs AND Digital: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire |
| + | Embedded and automotive work adds range for hardware-adjacent projects |
| + | Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, so financial results are public |
| - | Rapid growth through hiring and acquisitions can mean uneven maturity between business units |
| - | The UK office is small; nearly all engineers are in Poland |
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency |
| + | Regional clubs give UK clients a local team in many cities |
| + | Good fit for digital product work in retail and consumer brands |
| - | Onshore model means no offshore cost advantage |
| - | Headcount figures vary widely between sources |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers.
Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: a retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it.
Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Spyrosoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not published) vs AND Digital (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spyrosoft |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | AND Digital |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Spyrosoft |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | AND Digital fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it. | Limited | Strong | AND Digital |
| A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. | Limited | Strong | AND Digital |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs AND Digital
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business.
AND Digital (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. If your situation matches that, AND Digital is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs AND Digital FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than AND Digital?
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire. AND Digital's strongest advantage: knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency.
How do Spyrosoft and AND Digital differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. AND Digital uses time and materials, capability-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or AND Digital?
AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and AND Digital?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. AND Digital's primary differentiator is: delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 1,000–1,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Financial services vs Retail, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.