Made Tech vs Apadmi: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Made Tech (4.1/5) edges ahead of Apadmi (3.9/5) overall. Made Tech is the better choice for UK central and local government buyers. Apadmi is the stronger option for UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Made Tech vs Apadmi: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Made Tech | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2009 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 400–500 | 250–300 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names |
| Pricing model | Framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Ruby, Python, Java | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Public sector, Local government, Healthcare | Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector |
Made Tech vs Apadmi: overview
Made Tech
Made Tech was founded in London in 2008 and listed on AIM in 2021. FY25 revenue (to May 2025) rose 20% to £46.4m with a contracted backlog of £92.2m, and the company reported around 430 employees after a period of hiring. Almost all of its work is for UK central and local government, health and other regulated bodies. Contractor use rose to 19% of the workforce in FY25, and management has said it plans to bring that back toward 10%.
Apadmi
Apadmi was founded in 2009 in Manchester and has its headquarters at MediaCity. It reported more than 300 employees in 2024, with hubs in London, Edinburgh, Lisbon and Amsterdam. The company builds and maintains mobile apps for large UK brands, including Argos, the BBC, Co-op, Asda and the NHS. Its Lisbon hub adds a lower-cost option within Western Europe.
Services and capabilities: Made Tech vs Apadmi
| Capability | Made Tech | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Made Tech vs Apadmi
| Framework / platform | Made Tech | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Made Tech vs Apadmi
| Criterion | Made Tech | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Made Tech vs Apadmi
| Dimension | Made Tech | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Public sector, Local government, Healthcare | Retail, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced., A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. | A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt., An NHS body wants a patient app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Made Tech vs Apadmi: pros and cons
| Made Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks |
| + | Public reporting makes financial health easy to check |
| + | A growing backlog points to sustained repeat business from government |
| - | Little private-sector experience, so commercial buyers have better options |
| - | No offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates |
| - | Contractor reliance roughly doubled in FY25 |
| Apadmi | |
|---|---|
| + | Mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise |
| + | Recognisable UK client list gives reassurance on quality |
| + | Lisbon hub offers some rate flexibility |
| - | Narrow focus; back-office and enterprise systems are not its core |
| - | Mostly UK delivery, so pricing is close to onshore rates |
Who should choose Made Tech?
A typical fit: a council wants legacy case-management systems replaced.
Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Local government, Healthcare.
Who should choose Apadmi?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt.
Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Made Tech vs Apadmi
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Made Tech |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Made Tech (Not published) vs Apadmi (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Apadmi |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Made Tech vs Apadmi
| Use case | Made Tech fit | Apadmi fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced. | Strong | Limited | Made Tech |
| A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. | Strong | Limited | Made Tech |
| A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| An NHS body wants a patient app. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Made Tech vs Apadmi
Made Tech (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog.
Apadmi (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an NHS body wants a patient app. If your situation matches that, Apadmi is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Made Tech vs Apadmi FAQ
Is Made Tech better than Apadmi?
Made Tech (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Made Tech's strongest advantage: deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks. Apadmi's strongest advantage: mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise.
How do Made Tech and Apadmi differ in pricing?
Made Tech uses framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Apadmi uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Made Tech or Apadmi?
Made Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Made Tech and Apadmi?
Made Tech's primary differentiator is: public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Apadmi's primary differentiator is: mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. They also differ in team size (400–500 vs 250–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Local government vs Retail, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.