Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

Kainos vs Made Tech: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Kainos (4.2/5) edges ahead of Made Tech (4.1/5) overall. Kainos is the better choice for UK government digital services, Workday programmes. Made Tech is the stronger option for UK central and local government buyers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Kainos vs Made Tech: head-to-head summary

Criterion Kainos Made Tech
Founded 1986 2008
HQ Belfast, United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Team size 3,000+ 400–500
Rating 4.2 / 5 4.1 / 5
Primary differentiator Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog
Pricing model Time and materials, fixed price, framework call-offs Framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Java, .NET, AWS Ruby, Python, Java
Industries served Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Commercial enterprises Public sector, Local government, Healthcare

Kainos vs Made Tech: overview

Kainos

Kainos was founded in Belfast in 1986 and is listed on the London Stock Exchange. In the year to March 2026 it reported revenue of £431.1m, up 17%, and a workforce of 3,216 after adding 420 people, a rebound from a 2024/25 restructuring that cut staff by 7%. It runs three divisions: Digital Services, Workday Services and Workday Products. Its government work spans departments such as the Home Office and NHS bodies, delivered from the UK and Ireland.

Made Tech

Made Tech was founded in London in 2008 and listed on AIM in 2021. FY25 revenue (to May 2025) rose 20% to £46.4m with a contracted backlog of £92.2m, and the company reported around 430 employees after a period of hiring. Almost all of its work is for UK central and local government, health and other regulated bodies. Contractor use rose to 19% of the workforce in FY25, and management has said it plans to bring that back toward 10%.

Services and capabilities: Kainos vs Made Tech

Capability Kainos Made Tech
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✗ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✓ ✓
Data & AI ✓ ✓
Legacy modernisation ✓ ✓
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✗
Dedicated team model ✗ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Kainos vs Made Tech

Framework / platform Kainos Made Tech
.NET ✓ N/A
Java ✓ ✓
Python ✓ ✓
React N/A N/A
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Kubernetes ✓ N/A
Embedded N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Kainos vs Made Tech

Criterion Kainos Made Tech
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials Fixed project, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Kainos vs Made Tech

Dimension Kainos Made Tech
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services Public sector, Local government, Healthcare
Best use cases A government department needs a GOV.UK service built and run., An NHS body wants a digital patient service delivered onshore. A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced., A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service.
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Kainos vs Made Tech: pros and cons

Kainos
+ Belfast-based delivery costs less than London while staying UK-based
+ Public reporting gives buyers verified financials and headcount
+ Very familiar with UK public-sector procurement frameworks
- Little offshore capacity, so rates do not compete with nearshore vendors
- Workday business takes a growing share of leadership focus
- The 2024/25 restructuring shows exposure to swings in public-sector spending
Made Tech
+ Deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks
+ Public reporting makes financial health easy to check
+ A growing backlog points to sustained repeat business from government
- Little private-sector experience, so commercial buyers have better options
- No offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates
- Contractor reliance roughly doubled in FY25

Who should choose Kainos?

A typical fit: a government department needs a GOV.UK service built and run.

Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Commercial enterprises.

Who should choose Made Tech?

A typical fit: a council wants legacy case-management systems replaced.

Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Local government, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Kainos vs Made Tech

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Kainos
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Kainos (Not published) vs Made Tech (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Kainos
You want engineers added to your own in-house team Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Neither; consider an embedded specialist

Use case fit: Kainos vs Made Tech

Use case Kainos fit Made Tech fit Winner
A government department needs a GOV.UK service built and run. Strong Limited Kainos
An NHS body wants a digital patient service delivered onshore. Strong Limited Kainos
A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced. Limited Strong Made Tech
A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. Limited Strong Made Tech
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Limited Both equally
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Strong Both equally

Verdict: Kainos vs Made Tech

Kainos (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE.

Made Tech (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. If your situation matches that, Made Tech is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Kainos vs Made Tech FAQ

Is Kainos better than Made Tech?

Kainos (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Kainos's strongest advantage: belfast-based delivery costs less than London while staying UK-based. Made Tech's strongest advantage: deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks.

How do Kainos and Made Tech differ in pricing?

Kainos uses time and materials, fixed price, framework call-offs pricing. Made Tech uses framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Kainos or Made Tech?

Made Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Kainos and Made Tech?

Kainos's primary differentiator is: combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE. Made Tech's primary differentiator is: public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. They also differ in team size (3,000+ vs 400–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Healthcare vs Public sector, Local government).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.