Endava vs N-iX: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of N-iX (4.3/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. N-iX is the stronger option for large dedicated teams, data and cloud engineering, Ukrainian rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs N-iX: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Lviv, Ukraine (UK entity in London) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 2,000–2,500 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | A 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Dedicated team, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, .NET, Python |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Telecoms, Manufacturing, Healthcare |
Endava vs N-iX: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
N-iX
N-iX started in Lviv in 2002 as Novellix, building applications for Novell's Linux platform, and Novell became its first large client. It now reports more than 2,400 engineers in Ukraine, Poland and other countries. In the UK it trades through N-iX Technologies Limited, registered in London in 2022, though public sources do not show a staffed UK delivery office. It suits buyers who want a large Central and Eastern European engineering pool and are comfortable managing it remotely.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs N-iX
| Capability | Endava | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs N-iX
| Framework / platform | Endava | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs N-iX
| Criterion | Endava | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs N-iX
| Dimension | Endava | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Telecoms |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A retailer needs a 20-person data engineering team on Databricks., A telecoms company wants a long-term dedicated team for platform development. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs N-iX: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| N-iX | |
|---|---|
| + | Large engineering pool makes it practical to grow from 5 to 50 people on one account |
| + | Data engineering and cloud migration are well covered |
| + | Some embedded and IoT capability for connected-product work |
| - | UK presence appears to be a legal entity rather than a staffed delivery office |
| - | Most engineering is in Ukraine, so continuity planning should be part of due diligence |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose N-iX?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a 20-person data engineering team on Databricks.
A 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Telecoms, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs N-iX
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs N-iX (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | N-iX |
Use case fit: Endava vs N-iX
| Use case | Endava fit | N-iX fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A retailer needs a 20-person data engineering team on Databricks. | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| A telecoms company wants a long-term dedicated team for platform development. | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs N-iX
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
N-iX (4.3/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a telecoms company wants a long-term dedicated team for platform development. If your situation matches that, N-iX is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs N-iX FAQ
Is Endava better than N-iX?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. N-iX's strongest advantage: large engineering pool makes it practical to grow from 5 to 50 people on one account.
How do Endava and N-iX differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. N-iX uses dedicated team, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or N-iX?
N-iX is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and N-iX?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. N-iX's primary differentiator is: a 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 2,000–2,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.