Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

ELEKS vs STX Next: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

ELEKS (4.4/5) edges ahead of STX Next (4.2/5) overall. ELEKS is the better choice for data-heavy custom software, Ukrainian rates, mature processes. STX Next is the stronger option for python back ends and data products, Polish rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

ELEKS vs STX Next: head-to-head summary

Criterion ELEKS STX Next
Founded 1991 2005
HQ Tallinn, Estonia (engineering in Lviv; London office) Poznań, Poland
Team size 2,000+ 500–600
Rating 4.4 / 5 4.2 / 5
Primary differentiator Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit Deep Python specialism across web back ends, data engineering and machine learning
Pricing model Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price Time and materials, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack .NET, Java, Python Python, Django, FastAPI
Industries served Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail Fintech, Healthcare, Media, Retail

ELEKS vs STX Next: overview

ELEKS

ELEKS began in Lviv in 1991, which makes it one of the oldest software companies in Ukraine. It now lists Tallinn, Estonia as its corporate headquarters and keeps a London office on Beech Street. Around 2,000 specialists work on custom software, data science, and research and development projects, mostly from Ukraine and Poland. Its long history with Western European clients shows in fairly mature delivery processes.

STX Next

STX Next was founded in Poznań in 2005 and built its name as one of Europe's largest Python-focused development companies. Its March 2025 anniversary release cited about 500 people and more than 1,000 projects delivered. A later combination with Gliwice's Brainhub added roughly 100 more engineers. Innova Capital has been an investor since 2020.

Services and capabilities: ELEKS vs STX Next

Capability ELEKS STX Next
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✗ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✓ ✓
Data & AI ✓ ✓
Legacy modernisation ✗ ✗
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✗
Dedicated team model ✓ ✓
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: ELEKS vs STX Next

Framework / platform ELEKS STX Next
.NET ✓ N/A
Java ✓ N/A
Python ✓ ✓
React ✓ ✓
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Embedded N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: ELEKS vs STX Next

Criterion ELEKS STX Next
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: ELEKS vs STX Next

Dimension ELEKS STX Next
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare Fintech, Healthcare, Media
Best use cases A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software., A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. A fintech needs a Django back end rebuilt and scaled., A media company wants data ingestion jobs and recommendation models written in Python.
Typical project type Dedicated team Dedicated team

ELEKS vs STX Next: pros and cons

ELEKS
+ Thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract
+ A London office gives UK buyers a local contracting and meeting point
+ Data science and analytics work is a genuine strength alongside general development
+ Rates are in the Ukrainian band, well under UK onshore pricing
- Most engineering is in Ukraine, so buyers should review continuity plans given the war
- The London office is mainly a sales and account presence, not a delivery centre
STX Next
+ Python depth is hard to match among mid-sized European vendors
+ Combined STX Next and Brainhub team adds JavaScript and product capacity
+ Polish location gives near-total working-day overlap with the UK
- No staffed UK office was found, so account management is run from Poland
- The Brainhub merger is recent, and integration may take time

Who should choose ELEKS?

A typical fit: a logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software.

Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail.

Who should choose STX Next?

A typical fit: a fintech needs a Django back end rebuilt and scaled.

Deep Python specialism across web back ends, data engineering and machine learning. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Media, Retail.

Decision matrix: ELEKS vs STX Next

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope ELEKS
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme ELEKS
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: ELEKS (Not published) vs STX Next (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical ELEKS
You want engineers added to your own in-house team STX Next
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Neither; consider an embedded specialist

Use case fit: ELEKS vs STX Next

Use case ELEKS fit STX Next fit Winner
A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software. Strong Limited ELEKS
A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. Strong Limited ELEKS
A fintech needs a Django back end rebuilt and scaled. Limited Strong STX Next
A media company wants data ingestion jobs and recommendation models written in Python. Limited Strong STX Next
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Limited Both equally
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Limited ELEKS

Verdict: ELEKS vs STX Next

ELEKS (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit.

STX Next (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a media company wants data ingestion jobs and recommendation models written in Python. If your situation matches that, STX Next is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

ELEKS vs STX Next FAQ

Is ELEKS better than STX Next?

ELEKS (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ELEKS's strongest advantage: thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract. STX Next's strongest advantage: python depth is hard to match among mid-sized European vendors.

How do ELEKS and STX Next differ in pricing?

ELEKS uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. STX Next uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: ELEKS or STX Next?

STX Next is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between ELEKS and STX Next?

ELEKS's primary differentiator is: three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. STX Next's primary differentiator is: deep Python specialism across web back ends, data engineering and machine learning. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs 500–600), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Logistics vs Fintech, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.