ELEKS vs Scott Logic: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ELEKS (4.4/5) edges ahead of Scott Logic (4.3/5) overall. ELEKS is the better choice for data-heavy custom software, Ukrainian rates, mature processes. Scott Logic is the stronger option for capital markets and government, UK-only delivery required. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ELEKS vs Scott Logic: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ELEKS | Scott Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1991 | 2005 |
| HQ | Tallinn, Estonia (engineering in Lviv; London office) | Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 2,000+ | 400–500 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit | Trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price, capability-based |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | .NET, Java, Python | Java, C#, TypeScript |
| Industries served | Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail | Financial services, Capital markets, Public sector, Energy |
ELEKS vs Scott Logic: overview
ELEKS
ELEKS began in Lviv in 1991, which makes it one of the oldest software companies in Ukraine. It now lists Tallinn, Estonia as its corporate headquarters and keeps a London office on Beech Street. Around 2,000 specialists work on custom software, data science, and research and development projects, mostly from Ukraine and Poland. Its long history with Western European clients shows in fairly mature delivery processes.
Scott Logic
Former Lehman Brothers executive Gary Scott founded Scott Logic in Newcastle in 2005. It now employs 400+ people across Newcastle, London, Edinburgh, Bristol and Leeds, all in the UK. The firm is best known for trading and capital-markets software and for central government digital work. Every engineer is UK-based, which suits security-cleared and data-sensitive projects but rules out offshore cost savings.
Services and capabilities: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
| Capability | ELEKS | Scott Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
| Framework / platform | ELEKS | Scott Logic |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
| Criterion | ELEKS | Scott Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
| Dimension | ELEKS | Scott Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare | Financial services, Capital markets, Public sector |
| Best use cases | A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software., A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. | An investment bank needs a trading front end rebuilt by a UK-cleared team., A government department needs a digital service built to GDS standards. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
ELEKS vs Scott Logic: pros and cons
| ELEKS | |
|---|---|
| + | Thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract |
| + | A London office gives UK buyers a local contracting and meeting point |
| + | Data science and analytics work is a genuine strength alongside general development |
| + | Rates are in the Ukrainian band, well under UK onshore pricing |
| - | Most engineering is in Ukraine, so buyers should review continuity plans given the war |
| - | The London office is mainly a sales and account presence, not a delivery centre |
| Scott Logic | |
|---|---|
| + | UK-only staffing makes security clearance and data-residency requirements straightforward |
| + | Rare depth in trading platforms and low-latency financial software |
| + | Regional offices outside London keep rates below the big London consultancies |
| - | No nearshore or offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates for every role |
| - | Narrower industry spread than generalist outsourcing vendors |
Who should choose ELEKS?
A typical fit: a logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software.
Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail.
Who should choose Scott Logic?
A typical fit: an investment bank needs a trading front end rebuilt by a UK-cleared team.
Trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Capital markets, Public sector, Energy.
Decision matrix: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ELEKS |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | ELEKS |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ELEKS (Not published) vs Scott Logic (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ELEKS |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
| Use case | ELEKS fit | Scott Logic fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software. | Strong | Limited | ELEKS |
| A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. | Strong | Limited | ELEKS |
| An investment bank needs a trading front end rebuilt by a UK-cleared team. | Limited | Strong | Scott Logic |
| A government department needs a digital service built to GDS standards. | Limited | Strong | Scott Logic |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: ELEKS vs Scott Logic
ELEKS (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit.
Scott Logic (4.3/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a government department needs a digital service built to GDS standards. If your situation matches that, Scott Logic is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ELEKS vs Scott Logic FAQ
Is ELEKS better than Scott Logic?
ELEKS (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ELEKS's strongest advantage: thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract. Scott Logic's strongest advantage: UK-only staffing makes security clearance and data-residency requirements straightforward.
How do ELEKS and Scott Logic differ in pricing?
ELEKS uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Scott Logic uses time and materials, fixed price, capability-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ELEKS or Scott Logic?
Scott Logic is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ELEKS and Scott Logic?
ELEKS's primary differentiator is: three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. Scott Logic's primary differentiator is: trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs 400–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Logistics vs Financial services, Capital markets).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.