Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

ELEKS vs DataArt: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

ELEKS (4.4/5) edges ahead of DataArt (4.0/5) overall. ELEKS is the better choice for data-heavy custom software, Ukrainian rates, mature processes. DataArt is the stronger option for travel and finance firms, long-term nearshore teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

ELEKS vs DataArt: head-to-head summary

Criterion ELEKS DataArt
Founded 1991 1997
HQ Tallinn, Estonia (engineering in Lviv; London office) New York, United States (London office)
Team size 2,000+ 5,000–6,000
Rating 4.4 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering
Pricing model Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price Time and materials, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack .NET, Java, Python Java, .NET, Python
Industries served Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail

ELEKS vs DataArt: overview

ELEKS

ELEKS began in Lviv in 1991, which makes it one of the oldest software companies in Ukraine. It now lists Tallinn, Estonia as its corporate headquarters and keeps a London office on Beech Street. Around 2,000 specialists work on custom software, data science, and research and development projects, mostly from Ukraine and Poland. Its long history with Western European clients shows in fairly mature delivery processes.

DataArt

Eugene Goland founded DataArt in New York in 1997, and the company opened in London in 2001. It reports more than 6,000 people as of September 2025, spread across Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America and elsewhere. Travel and hospitality, finance and healthcare are its strongest industries. UK clients get a long-standing London presence with delivery from lower-cost locations.

Services and capabilities: ELEKS vs DataArt

Capability ELEKS DataArt
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✗ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✓ ✓
Data & AI ✓ ✓
Legacy modernisation ✗ ✓
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✗
Dedicated team model ✓ ✓
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: ELEKS vs DataArt

Framework / platform ELEKS DataArt
.NET ✓ ✓
Java ✓ ✓
Python ✓ ✓
React ✓ ✓
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Embedded N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: ELEKS vs DataArt

Criterion ELEKS DataArt
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials Dedicated team, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: ELEKS vs DataArt

Dimension ELEKS DataArt
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare
Best use cases A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software., A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work., A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised.
Typical project type Dedicated team Dedicated team

ELEKS vs DataArt: pros and cons

ELEKS
+ Thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract
+ A London office gives UK buyers a local contracting and meeting point
+ Data science and analytics work is a genuine strength alongside general development
+ Rates are in the Ukrainian band, well under UK onshore pricing
- Most engineering is in Ukraine, so buyers should review continuity plans given the war
- The London office is mainly a sales and account presence, not a delivery centre
DataArt
+ London office has been open since 2001
+ Specialist knowledge of travel booking and distribution systems
+ Delivery spread across several regions
- US headquarters means UK contracts may sit with a non-UK parent
- Headcount estimates vary widely between sources

Who should choose ELEKS?

A typical fit: a logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software.

Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail.

Who should choose DataArt?

A typical fit: a travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work.

Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail.

Decision matrix: ELEKS vs DataArt

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope ELEKS
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme ELEKS
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: ELEKS (Not published) vs DataArt (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical ELEKS
You want engineers added to your own in-house team Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Neither; consider an embedded specialist

Use case fit: ELEKS vs DataArt

Use case ELEKS fit DataArt fit Winner
A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software. Strong Limited ELEKS
A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. Strong Limited ELEKS
A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work. Limited Strong DataArt
A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. Limited Strong DataArt
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Limited Both equally
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Limited ELEKS

Verdict: ELEKS vs DataArt

ELEKS (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit.

DataArt (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. If your situation matches that, DataArt is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

ELEKS vs DataArt FAQ

Is ELEKS better than DataArt?

ELEKS (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ELEKS's strongest advantage: thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract. DataArt's strongest advantage: london office has been open since 2001.

How do ELEKS and DataArt differ in pricing?

ELEKS uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. DataArt uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: ELEKS or DataArt?

DataArt is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between ELEKS and DataArt?

ELEKS's primary differentiator is: three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. DataArt's primary differentiator is: two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs 5,000–6,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Logistics vs Travel and hospitality, Financial services).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.