Apadmi vs Itransition: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Apadmi (3.9/5) edges ahead of Itransition (3.8/5) overall. Apadmi is the better choice for UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. Itransition is the stronger option for budget-conscious buyers, broad generalist work. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Apadmi vs Itransition: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Apadmi | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 1998 |
| HQ | Manchester, United Kingdom | Tbilisi, Georgia (London office) |
| Team size | 250–300 | 3,000+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names | Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | .NET, Java, PHP |
| Industries served | Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector | Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Logistics |
Apadmi vs Itransition: overview
Apadmi
Apadmi was founded in 2009 in Manchester and has its headquarters at MediaCity. It reported more than 300 employees in 2024, with hubs in London, Edinburgh, Lisbon and Amsterdam. The company builds and maintains mobile apps for large UK brands, including Argos, the BBC, Co-op, Asda and the NHS. Its Lisbon hub adds a lower-cost option within Western Europe.
Itransition
Itransition has been delivering software since 1998 and reports more than 3,000 engineers serving clients in over 40 countries. It lists a London office, while PitchBook gives Tbilisi, Georgia as its corporate office. Historically its delivery base was in Belarus, and it has since built up other locations. Its services span custom development, Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics, and testing.
Services and capabilities: Apadmi vs Itransition
| Capability | Apadmi | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Apadmi vs Itransition
| Framework / platform | Apadmi | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Apadmi vs Itransition
| Criterion | Apadmi | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Apadmi vs Itransition
| Dimension | Apadmi | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Media, Healthcare | Healthcare, Retail, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt., An NHS body wants a patient app. | A company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate., A retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Apadmi vs Itransition: pros and cons
| Apadmi | |
|---|---|
| + | Mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise |
| + | Recognisable UK client list gives reassurance on quality |
| + | Lisbon hub offers some rate flexibility |
| - | Narrow focus; back-office and enterprise systems are not its core |
| - | Mostly UK delivery, so pricing is close to onshore rates |
| Itransition | |
|---|---|
| + | Among the lowest rates for a vendor of this size |
| + | Covers CRM platforms such as Salesforce and Dynamics as well as custom builds |
| + | Large team for staffing flexibility |
| - | Thin evidence of UK-based delivery or account leadership |
| - | Corporate location data is inconsistent between sources |
| - | Historical Belarus base may raise questions with some UK procurement teams |
Who should choose Apadmi?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt.
Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector.
Who should choose Itransition?
A typical fit: a company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate.
Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Apadmi vs Itransition
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Apadmi |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Itransition |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Apadmi (Not published) vs Itransition (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Apadmi |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Apadmi vs Itransition
| Use case | Apadmi fit | Itransition fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt. | Strong | Limited | Apadmi |
| An NHS body wants a patient app. | Strong | Limited | Apadmi |
| A company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate. | Limited | Strong | Itransition |
| A retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. | Limited | Strong | Itransition |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Apadmi vs Itransition
Apadmi (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names.
Itransition (3.8/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. If your situation matches that, Itransition is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Apadmi vs Itransition FAQ
Is Apadmi better than Itransition?
Apadmi (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Apadmi's strongest advantage: mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise. Itransition's strongest advantage: among the lowest rates for a vendor of this size.
How do Apadmi and Itransition differ in pricing?
Apadmi uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Itransition uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Apadmi or Itransition?
Apadmi is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Apadmi and Itransition?
Apadmi's primary differentiator is: mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Itransition's primary differentiator is: low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services. They also differ in team size (250–300 vs 3,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Media vs Healthcare, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.