Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI): full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) edges ahead of BJSS (CGI) (4.0/5) overall. Amdaris (Insight) is the better choice for UK firms on Azure, .NET modernisation, Eastern European rates. BJSS (CGI) is the stronger option for NHS and government programmes, large onshore delivery. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI): head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Amdaris (Insight) | BJSS (CGI) |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 1993 |
| HQ | Bristol, United Kingdom (owned by Insight Enterprises) | Leeds, United Kingdom (owned by CGI) |
| Team size | 800+ | 2,000–2,500 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe | Large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price, managed service |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | .NET, Azure, AWS | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector | Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Retail, Energy |
Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI): overview
Amdaris (Insight)
Amdaris was set up in 2009 by Andy Rogers and Vlad Nanu and grew from Bristol into a business of 800+ people, with delivery centres in Moldova and Romania. US-based Insight Enterprises, a Fortune 500 solutions integrator, bought it in August 2023 and folded it into its application and data practices. The UK client relationship remains Bristol-led. Buyers should expect Amdaris to sit inside a larger Insight sales motion now.
BJSS (CGI)
BJSS was founded in Leeds in 1993 and grew into one of the UK's largest independent technology consultancies before CGI completed its acquisition in February 2025. The deal brought about 2,400 BJSS staff into CGI and took CGI's UK headcount past 8,500. BJSS teams are being merged into CGI's metro-based UK operating model. UK clients get the scale and governance of a global group, with nearshore capacity now available through CGI centres such as Portugal.
Services and capabilities: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
| Capability | Amdaris (Insight) | BJSS (CGI) |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
| Framework / platform | Amdaris (Insight) | BJSS (CGI) |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
| Criterion | Amdaris (Insight) | BJSS (CGI) |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Managed service, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
| Dimension | Amdaris (Insight) | BJSS (CGI) |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail | Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure., A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. | An NHS trust needs a national-scale digital service., A bank wants a large onshore team with independent testing. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI): pros and cons
| Amdaris (Insight) | |
|---|---|
| + | Moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor |
| + | Strong Microsoft and .NET focus suits companies already invested in Azure |
| + | Insight's backing adds financial stability and wider infrastructure services |
| - | Acquired by Insight Enterprises in 2023, so priorities may shift toward Insight's own product and licensing business |
| - | Less depth outside the Microsoft stack than broader engineering firms |
| - | Delivery locations are close to the war in Ukraine, which some risk teams will flag |
| BJSS (CGI) | |
|---|---|
| + | Long record on large NHS and government programmes |
| + | CGI ownership adds financial stability and access to nearshore centres |
| + | Strong testing and quality engineering practice |
| - | Acquired by CGI in 2025, and integration into CGI's model may change account teams and processes |
| - | Large-consultancy pricing and governance are heavy for small projects |
Who should choose Amdaris (Insight)?
A typical fit: a UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure.
A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector.
Who should choose BJSS (CGI)?
A typical fit: an NHS trust needs a national-scale digital service.
Large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Retail, Energy.
Decision matrix: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Amdaris (Insight) |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Amdaris (Insight) |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Amdaris (Insight) (Not published) vs BJSS (CGI) (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | BJSS (CGI) |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
| Use case | Amdaris (Insight) fit | BJSS (CGI) fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure. | Strong | Limited | Amdaris (Insight) |
| A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. | Strong | Limited | Amdaris (Insight) |
| An NHS trust needs a national-scale digital service. | Limited | Strong | BJSS (CGI) |
| A bank wants a large onshore team with independent testing. | Limited | Strong | BJSS (CGI) |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI)
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe.
BJSS (CGI) (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a bank wants a large onshore team with independent testing. If your situation matches that, BJSS (CGI) is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Amdaris (Insight) vs BJSS (CGI) FAQ
Is Amdaris (Insight) better than BJSS (CGI)?
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Amdaris (Insight)'s strongest advantage: moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor. BJSS (CGI)'s strongest advantage: long record on large NHS and government programmes.
How do Amdaris (Insight) and BJSS (CGI) differ in pricing?
Amdaris (Insight) uses dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price pricing. BJSS (CGI) uses time and materials, fixed price, managed service pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Amdaris (Insight) or BJSS (CGI)?
BJSS (CGI) is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Amdaris (Insight) and BJSS (CGI)?
Amdaris (Insight)'s primary differentiator is: a UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. BJSS (CGI)'s primary differentiator is: large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network. They also differ in team size (800+ vs 2,000–2,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Public sector, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.